When and when not to use cloud native security tools
With the emergence of cyberattacks, it’s no wonder that cloud protection is a top priority for most, if not all, businesses. However, since there are so many cloud-native security tools and services available to help protect their environments, IT teams often hesitate to select the best approach.
Cloud workloads can be protected using two types of services: vendor-supplied cloud-native security software and third-party security tools from other organizations or, in some cases, open-source tools.
But which of the cloud-native security tools protection tool is the most effective? The response is highly dependent on the cloud infrastructure and the existence of an organization’s security requirements. Most major cloud providers provide various cloud-native protection tools, each designed to meet specific security requirements. However, it is up to the users to find the one that best suits their security needs.
Examine the various security thoughts or ideas from AWS, Google, and Microsoft before determining whether an oracle cloud security tool is right for your workloads. But it’s not always possible to produce a one-to-one comparison. The functionality of the resources from each provider for each category is more or less comparable.
Identity and Access Management
Identity and access control (IAM) systems are available in all public clouds. These frameworks allow cloud administrators to control which users or services can access cloud-based workloads or resources.
Complementary services for implementing two-factor authentication, incorporating cloud-native security solutions with IAM applications with directory services, and handling other common authentication and authorization tasks are also available from these vendors.
Auditing and monitoring
Amazon Inspector and Microsoft’s Cloud Security Center are cloud-native security tools that automatically inspect the specification of popular cloud workloads and produce warnings when possible security issues are found. Google Cloud Data Encryption and Amazon Macie also have similar data security capabilities by automatically detecting and alerting users when sensitive information is not properly protected.
There are tools like Amazon GuardDuty and Azure Advanced Threat Protection that track events that could indicate cloud-native security platform-based security issues in cloud and on-premises environments to protect data further.
Firewalls and anti-DDoS
IT teams install firewalls that manage network access to cloud-based applications using services like Google Cloud Armor, Azure Firewall, and AWS Web Application Firewall. DDoS attacks on cloud-based infrastructure can be mitigated using related tools.
Using native features built into storage services such As Amazon S3 and Azure Blob Storage, data stored on the major public clouds can be encrypted voluntarily or automatically. Cloud-based key management services, such as Azure Key Vault and Google Key Management Service, are also available as a part of cloud-native security tools public cloud providers for safely keeping track of encryption keys.
Security operations centers
Finally, cloud vendors provide similar security operations centers to help cloud administrators manage multiple security tools and related data. To help users control their security resources, the Big Three providers provide Azure Security Center, AWS Security Hub, and Google Cloud Platform’s Security Command Center.
Third-party cloud security tools
While some businesses will rely on the security resources provided by their cloud provider, there are other choices. Many third-party cloud-native security tools, in reality, can perform the same functions as mentioned above.
For example, you can use commercial services like Splunk, IBM QRadar, or LogRhythm to track the cloud infrastructure for security incidents. These services often provide many of the features of the security operations center.
Open-source tools like VeraCrypt and AxCrypt can encrypt data stored in the cloud. Cloud applications can be protected against network-borne attacks using third-party firewall tools like Cloudflare and Akamai.
This raises the question of whether you can use your cloud vendor’s security software or go for a third-party solution. When deciding on the best solution, three considerations must be considered.
What are your on-premises security needs?
Some cloud-native security services, such as Amazon GuardDuty and Azure Advanced Threat Protection, can handle security threats for both on-premises and cloud-based networks, while others are cloud-only. For example, you can’t encrypt on-premises data with a cloud-based data protection service’s native encryption features.
For example, cloud-based firewall services may theoretically be used to protect on-premises applications, but only if a relatively complex and costly infrastructure to integrate such apps with cloud firewall services is in place.
As a result, companies with a large presence on-premises and in the public cloud should consider using third-party cloud-native security solutions. Third-party vendors provide greater parity in protecting both cloud-based and on-premises infrastructure in this case, so public cloud-native protection tools are insufficient.