What Are the Types of Hybrid Work Models? Pros and Cons for Each

The most discussed work model of the previous year was hybrid work. For many businesses, the decision to adopt a hybrid work model environment or to maintain the traditional five-day on-site workweek is still up in the air. According to a recent Envoy + Wakefield return to the workplace poll, employers cannot afford to maintain the status quo, which states the need for modern workplace services. 

modern workplace as a service - expandFORCE

According to the report, 47% of employees want to have more freedom regarding where and how they work. Employers who do not adapt risk losing almost half of their employees to those that do. The good news is that with the proper hybrid work paradigm, both companies and employees may benefit. In this piece, we will discuss the three most prevalent hybrid work models. We’ll discuss what they’re doing with current workplace services and the advantages and disadvantages of each. 

Option A – Mix of On-Site and Remote Workers  

A portion of your personnel works entirely on-site in this hybrid work style, while the remainder works entirely remotely. This is the simplest of the hybrid model of working, but to illustrate what it may look like, let’s look at an example. 

Recently, a pharmaceutical business implemented this employment paradigm to diversify its talent pool. 30% of its workers work on-site full-time to ensure they have access to the equipment and resources necessary for productivity. The remaining 70% of employees work remotely on a full-time basis, as they may complete their tasks from their laptops as a part of leveraging workplace modernization services. The company has reduced its real estate footprint to save on overhead expenditures since adopting this model. 

Pros 

  • Being aware of who will be on-site during the week.
  • Employees that place a premium on a stable work environment may like this configuration.
  • Employers can recruit remote talent from any location on Earth.

Cons 

  • This strategy does not provide employees with the same level of freedom as some hybrid WFH model arrangements provide.
  • On-site employees do not enjoy the same remote work perks as their colleagues with current workplace services; for example, on-site employees must spend time and money traveling to and from work.
  • Remote workers may feel disconnected from the workplace and the general corporate culture.

Tip: Equip your workers with technology that enables team productivity regardless of location. Be deliberate in your approach to introducing new workplace technologies to your employees. Inquire about suggestions for modern workplace services to enhance your hybrid work tech stack and evolve. 

Option B – All employees work on-site every week  

This is maybe the most discussed hybrid work model. Your personnel can work the on-site portion of the week and remotely the remainder of the week under this approach. 

Following the pandemic, when all workers worked remotely, the corporation used this mixed work arrangement. On certain days of the week, employees in all three offices have the option of working remotely when a modern workplace as a service is in place. They are required to work on-site for the remaining days. 

workplace modernization services - expandFORCE

Pros:  

  • All employees have the option of working from home;
  • Investments in devices that support hybrid work generate a broader return on investment because everyone benefits.
  • With fewer personnel on-site at any given moment, overhead costs are reduced.

Cons: 

  • It may be difficult for employees and executives to keep track of who is on-site and when.
  • Workplace teams must take additional measures to ensure employee connectivity and productivity.

Tip: Create employee timetables to provide structure to your team while also allowing for flexibility. 

Option C – Hybrid of both the options 

Some of your staff have the option to work in the office, working from home on days they like, or at a client’s location when they have clients present. The staff who remain do so entirely remotely or entirely on-site. 

For example, here’s what it might look like. The head office of a manufacturing business is located in Los Angeles, whereas a manufacturing factory is situated in Paris. Employees in Los Angeles arrive to work on preassigned days, while most of the time, they work remotely, such as from a coffee shop or at home. Technology experts and professionals of other industries in Paris spend all of their time in the workplace. Remote workers make up a part of current workplace services, and they work full-time from locations all across the world. 

Pros 

Businesses with employees who cannot work remotely can provide flexible working arrangements to those members of their staff who can deliver superior results. 

Cons 

  • It’s more challenging to scale workplace initiatives when each location has a distinct structure;
  • It can be challenging to foster a feeling of community, culture, and connection among employees across multiple areas and operating under various models.

Tip: Establish specific policies governing your company’s work model. If individual workplaces operate under distinct work models, be sure to highlight such distinctions so that employees are aware of the work settings accessible to them based on their allocated workplace. 

Hybrid model work from home is a relatively new style of employee management for many businesses. Employers should consult closely with seniors to decide the best course of action. It may be a case of piloting a model with a small number of teams or locations at first, then scaling up once the kinks are worked out. 

Share This Post

4400 N. Federal Highway, Suite 210
Boca Raton, FL 33431

(954) 271-5970

info@expandforce.com

Privacy & Cookies Policy